Sources and research pointers

Sources

Locked sources already provided by Dennis

None external.

The central FAF hypothesis and design rules originate from the candidate design discussion.

Core source status

Most of the article can be written as an explicit design proposal without external factual claims.

The research archive contains implementation-specific source locators for:

• Danish food-business registration and traceability;
• VAT and confectionery tax stress tests;
• equipment capacity;
• cleaning/hygiene;
• small-batch confectionery machinery.

Those sources support stress tests, not the universal FAF architecture.

Internal evidence

Research Gates 0–26.

Especially:

• research/gate-6-community-demand-floor.md
• research/gate-8-governance.md
• research/gate-11-succession-continuity.md
• research/gate-12-node-identity-transfer-protocol.md
• research/gate-19-capability-graph.md
• research/gate-20-ingredient-transfer-contract.md
• research/gate-21-customer-facing-lineage.md
• research/gate-22-common-identity-without-franchise.md
• research/gate-23-minimum-network-cost.md
• research/gate-24-verification-without-bureaucracy.md
• research/gate-25-dispute-and-appeal.md
• research/gate-26-end-to-end-node-story.md

Sources still to verify before publication

If the article names precedents, locally capture and verify:

• multi-producer food-hub precedent;
• REKO / concentrated pickup precedent;
• multi-maker confectionery retail precedent.

If the article uses specific equipment/capacity examples, locally verify the manufacturer pages already documented in the research archive.

If the article uses Danish law/tax examples, re-check effective law at publication time.

Source risks

• manufacturer throughput is not human labour productivity;
• one-country regulatory evidence is not universal FAF architecture;
• synthetic economic scenarios are not forecasts;
• no live FAF network exists.

Apple boundary

All apple-specific process and market sources have moved to the separate apple-edge candidate.